Car culture or not, “basic human needs” are things absolutely essential for survival (e.g., water, food source, clean shelter, breathable air, sleep), and fundamentally they don’t differ for humans in any location on the planet. Yet, in America, it appears some people believe that if you live in a certain location a car should be called a “basic human need.” (6 out of 9 answers said a car is a basic human need. See here: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;… ) A “need” is something that is absolutely essential, but in the U.S. nobody “needs” to live so far from resources for survival that the only option to get there is having your own car. People choose to create such circumstances. Even when they claim they “had no choice” but to live miles away from a grocery store, etc., it was still a choice they made to put themselves in a precarious circumstance. These people think whether a car is a basic human need “depends on where you live,” but the truth is to live in such a way that you’ve become dependant on a car for your survival is also a choice, and arguably it’s part maladapted. Why?–Because if your way of life habitually demands a “tool” that allows you to survive, once it’s broken you’re dead. If there are other ways to live without the tool, and you’ve never integrated those ways into your way of life, you have less flexability for survival. Your strategy was to focus on the car as the means of your survival rather than doing something like living within walking distance of resources or your job. You are also more likely to be out of shape physically (i.e., another form of being maladapted) compared to the person routinely walking or riding a bike to get to resources. So, why is it that some Americans have convinced themselves that having a car is so essential that it deserves to be called a “basic human need,” (which it is definately not)?

Related Posts